|
home | latest news | back issues | who is dylan? | contact Internet business news and analysis. by Dylan Tweney Digital Darwinism?For top Internet stock analyst Mary Meeker, "digital Darwinism" is the theory that the Web is an economic ecosystem of sorts, and as it evolves, only the largest, strongest companies will survive [1]. Over time, the theory goes, the largest companies will come to dominate the Internet, driving smaller competitors out of business or acquiring them, until each online industry is dominated by one or two massive market leaders. All I can say is that the people who coined this unfortunate term must have flunked out of high school biology. If bigger is better, where are all the dinosaurs? That's right -- they're *dead*. To be fair, a Web search reveals that the term "digital Darwinism" has been used in a variety of contradictory ways. A few years ago, its primary use was in referring to artificial life and self-evolving computer programs. More recently, it has been connected with the trend of thinking about economics in biological terms -- spearheaded by Kevin Kelly and a passel of libertarian free-market capitalists (see [2,3] for good introductions). And, soon, author Evan I. Schwartz, author of the very insightful and under-appreciated book Webonomics, will be coming out with a book entitled Digital Darwinism [4]. In some ways, marketplaces *are* like ecosystems, and the Web is a marketplace, albeit with different governing rules than in the offline world. But gigantism offers no more benefits online than it does in the natural world. In fact, there are many disadvantages to enormous size on- and offline: slow speed, lack of agility, an enormous appetite, and difficulty reproducing. Not only that, the argument flies in the face of reality. Example: people have been predicting the demise of the small independent ISP for years now. According to this logic, the telcos (AT&T, MCI Worldcom) should have dominated Internet access services by now. Instead, the largest ISP is AOL, with some 15 million subscribers. And, despite consolidation, the number of independent ISPs continues to grow -- over 5,000 at last count. The number of independent ISPs keeps growing because small ISPs can provide local or niche markets with much more personalized attention than the large providers can. That personal and localized service is so valuable, in fact, that small ISPs can buy access wholesale from the large providers and then resell it at a higher price -- and still find customers willing to pay the price. (For a read on the relative health of the ISP industry, check out ISPCon in Baltimore this week [5].) A similar phenomenon is happening in Internet commerce. Example: Amazon.com. It's an enormous online retailer in its own right, of course. But it also peacefully coexists with (and, in fact, is greatly aided by) tens of thousands of smaller Web commerce sites, which it calls "Associates," and to which it pays commissions for reselling Amazon.com's goods. Sure, the Web may be an ecosystem. But like most ecosystems, survival of the fittest does not mean that a single species gobbles up everything else. Instead, a diversity of creatures large and small take advantage of niche opportunities throughout the system, in turn creating resources and opportunities for other creatures. If anything, there's an advantage in small size and great numbers -- which may be why, insect-like, a swarm of different Linux species are rapidly expanding their habitat online. [1] The woman in the bubble: How Mary Meeker helps Internet entrepreneurs
become very, very rich [2] Bionomics
101: Paulina Borsook on the new economic Darwinism (Oct. 1996) [3] Survival
of the Fittest (David R. Henderson in the Red Herring, Dec. 1997) [4] Teaser site for
Digital Darwinism, by Evan I. Schwartz ---------- APPLE RELEASED QuickTime 4 last week, jumping on the streaming media bandwagon and hitching it to an open source horse [6]. As I wrote in last week's Tweney Report, and in this week's Net Prophet (see below), IBM, Microsoft, and AT&T have all recently launched streaming media / downloadable music file formats in an attempt to forestall MP3. Apple, curiously enough, is the only one bold enough to add open source to the mix. The company is hoping this move will help make QuickTime 4 widespread enough to be a credible competitor to Real Networks and MP3. [6] Apple
joins streaming media fray ---------- NEWS FEED /// What's been happening An eclectic selection of notable Internet business news. Annoying indeed: Oops: Skip the IPO, let's go straight to the auction block: How to burn up tens of millions in venture capital without turning a
profit, get your butt kicked by a scrappy late arrival, and still get
bags of cash to do it all over again in a new industry: Is "in your face" the same thing as "easier"? The Web really is world wide: ---------- INBOX /// What you're telling me from Betsy Hecksel <bhecksel@axtive.com>:
Plus: NET PROPHET: MP3 David vs. industry Goliaths MP3 has a lot of big companies running scared. In fact, they're so scared that they've agreed to stop bashing each other in the head long enough to try and quash the grassroots threat presented by this digital audio compression format. ... click for more ... ~ Back issues ~Online multimedia - Cluetrain feedback - Consumers, unite! (4.19.1999) Commerce reigns at Spring Internet World - privacy legislation - online wine - Not just business as usual (4.12.1999) |
Join my free mailing list! Just
enter your email address in the box below and click the button:
- |
||
|
Links worth clicking cluetrain.com tbtf ditherati posthoc.com |
|||
|
|
|||
|
- |